Praise for Chai Jing's smog survey is similar, but the value of criticism varies- SF6在线监测系统_SF6检漏仪_SF6传感器_SF6密度继电器

韦弗斯新闻动态

最新动态

SF6安全保障专家

专注于SF6气体检测的专业化

135 85763546

Praise for Chai Jing's smog survey is similar, but the value of criticism varies

发布时间：2015-11-25 来源：ydlcb 浏览次数：41次

Praise for Chai Jing's smog survey is similar, but the value of criticism varies

[Winfoss · China] 8 years of reputation, professional solution 30000 customer product needs and professional services [online consultation] hotline: 400-668-3536

Chai Jing claimed to spend 1 million yuan of her own money to shoot a documentary on smog, which is not surprising. She has always been enthusiastic about environmental protection, and once read the environmental Bible "Silent Spring" religiously. Haze is indeed the subject of her heart.

It seems that the media attention before the two sessions will be attracted by Chai Jing. A year later, she returned with the smog investigation documentary "Under the Dome", which received 6 million views on Youku on the day of its launch, and nearly 100 million views on the whole network in 24 hours. On the eve of the Spring Festival, the homesickness caused by the return of doctoral students to their hometown records is ultimately not worth the citizens' sorrow for the smog, and the dispute between duang and dress color after the Spring Festival is more like the warm-up and preparation of network popularity. Now, everyone looked up at Chai Jing.

It is not surprising that Chai Jing claimed to have spent 1 million yuan of her own money to make a documentary on smog. She has always been enthusiastic about environmental protection, and once read the environmental Bible "Silent Spring" religiously. Haze is indeed the subject of her heart.

Chai Jing's self-funded documentary on smog investigation "Under the Dome", once broadcast, is like a boulder thrown into the lake of public opinion, stirring up thousands of waves. After the publication of this work, praise and criticism poured in. The praise, for the most part, struck a similar tone -- praising the work for drawing public attention to the smog problem, the sophistication of its production and the depth of its content. However, the voices of criticism are different, and the value behind these criticisms is worth exploring in depth.

It is undeniable that Chai Jing's haze survey has made great contributions to promoting the awareness and attention of the society to the haze problem. With her keen perspective and strong sense of social responsibility, she visually presents the "invisible killer" of smog in front of the public, making people deeply aware of the seriousness of smog and its great threat to life and health. At this point, most of the praise is heartfelt and justified.

However, critical voices are equally valuable. Some critics pointed out that in the process of investigation, the selection of some data and cases may be one-sided, failing to present a comprehensive and objective picture of the haze problem. Such criticism reminds us that when dealing with any social issue, we need to maintain a rigorous and comprehensive attitude, and cannot draw conclusions based on a single perspective or local phenomenon. It encourages us to pay more attention to the integrity and accuracy of information in the follow-up discussion and solution process, and avoid being biased.

There is also a criticism that Chai may be too idealistic or simplistic in her solutions while presenting problems. The formation of haze problem is a complex systematic project, involving many aspects such as economic development model, energy structure, industrial layout, policies and regulations, and public awareness. Simply putting forward some solutions may face many difficulties and challenges in actual operation. Such criticism helps us to think more rationally about the solution of the problem, take full account of various realistic factors and constraints, and work out a more scientific, reasonable and feasible plan.

In addition, some critics, from the perspective of communication effect and social impact, believe that Chai Jing's investigation may cause a certain degree of social panic while arousing public attention. This criticism reminds us that in the process of disseminating information and knowledge, we should not only pay attention to the authenticity and science of the content, but also pay attention to the mode and effect of communication, grasp the degree, and avoid the negative impact of excessive rendering or improper communication on the society.

In short, both praise and criticism of Chai Jing's smog survey have their own significance and value. Praise is the affirmation of its positive contribution, while criticism is the motivation to push us to further think and improve. In the face of major social problems such as smog, we need to draw strength from praise, constantly reflect on criticism, and jointly explore effective ways to solve problems with a more rational, scientific and pragmatic attitude, and work hard for our blue sky and our future.

For more information about Weavers & China, please visit [Weavers. China] http://www.winfoss.com/.

Service hotline: 400-668-3536

------ Responsible Editor: [Winfoss & China] Marketing Department